Interpretation of apocalypse of John-The authentic mimetic meaning of christianity and religious exoterism

Ferdinando Sorbo's connection between Parmenides's critique of nominalism and the ontological reality of mythical and legendary creatures constitutes the metaphysical and counter-historical core of the essay. The author uses ancient Greek philosophy to deconstruct the alliance between language and modern skepticism, rehabilitating the concreteness of what we now call "fable." The conceptual transition applied in the essay is articulated through specific philosophical and biopolitical passages. 1. The Critique of Nominalism through Parmenides. Nominalism (rooted in medieval and modern thought) maintains that abstract concepts, universals, and names are pure linguistic conventions (flatus vocis), devoid of a real and material counterpart. Sorbo overturns this perspective by relying on Parmenides's ontology, for which Being is and cannot not be, while Thought and Language are inextricably linked to Existence ("thinking and being are the same thing"). If something can be thought, named, and transmitted, it intrinsically possesses a share of ontological reality that modern nominalism has attempted to empty, reducing it to mere abstraction or poetic fiction. 2. From Word to Flesh: Myth..